4 ms·

I am not part of LJC nor do I speak for the LJC but I found the following thread very revealing: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-May/012

• kodablah 9y ago
  Ah, yes, specification details and wording/specificity. Always important when supporting independent implementations, but seems a bit pedantic to warrant a complete "no", but as others in their "no" mention, I would expect it to be remedied before the next ballot.