I see this: >But there are still pain points – build/release, localization, and divergent plans with respect to add-ons, to name a few. These are pain points f

I see this: >But there are still pain points – build/release, localization, and divergent plans with respect to add-ons, to name a few. These are pain points for both Thunderbird and Firefox, and we obviously want them resolved. However, the Council feels these pain points would not be addressed by moving to TDF or SFC. and then this > We have come to the conclusion that a move to a non-Mozilla organization will be a major distraction to addressing technical issues and building a strong Thunderbird team. Also, while we hope to be independent from Gecko in the long term, it is in Thunderbird’s interest to remain as close to Mozilla as possible to in the hope that it gives use better access to people who can help us plan for and sort through Gecko-driven incompatibilities. So I'm not sure I fully understand their direction. Are they simply less focused on solving those issues right now? I use Thunderbird but don't really have a horse in the race, I get what I need out of it and I support them, I'm just curious.