3 ms·
Article doesn't really support the headline. The sole argument they provide that there was any "blowback" was that one time he brought it up in a job interview
by pmorici 9y ago
Article doesn't really support the headline. The sole argument they provide that there was any "blowback" was that one time he brought it up in a job interview and didn't get a call back. Hardly enough to say your career prospects are some how wrecked because you exposed a blatant fraud.
- humanrebar 9y agoIt also says he was allegedly fired when the SEC cooperation was discovered.
- lightbyte 9y agoThey are claiming he already gave notice he was leaving before then so they just accelerated the process.
- vesinisa 9y agoThat's exactly what I would claim if someone accused me of unlawful termination.
- pmorici 9y agoIs getting fired from a fraudulent company really a net negative?
- nickpsecurity 9y agoEven being associated with one is. Then, being a whistleblower is a major risk to HR since most will assume the person might publish just anything as opposed to worst stuff. He already claims to have been rejected for a job being a whistleblower but rejections happen for a lot of reasons.
- fullshark 9y agoIt's a pretty thin piece. I'd like to read more.