3 ms·
Sure, I read the article. That section covers just CUBIC.
by huhtenberg 10y ago
Sure, I read the article. That section covers just CUBIC.
- dsr_ 10y agoIt also doesn't discuss competition between BBR users. Playing nicely with your neighbors is important for the health of the Internet.
- Arnt 10y agoIt doesn't discuss competition with either many users, with things like webrtc, or with those evil dial-a-speed schemes. The internet is complex. However, since the dial-a-speed evildoers haven't caused much controversy in the grand scheme of things, I don't think BPR will do real harm in that case. I'm more concerned about unloaded parts of a circuit. Suppose some BPR streams fill one hop, and share other, higher-capacity, hops with Reno. Does Reno do as well then as it would if the BPR streams were Reno?
- metafnord 10y agoSeveral BBR flows do actually converge quite nicely to a fair share of bandwidth. Take a look at the presentation the guys from google gave at the IETF 97 in Seoul: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-iccrg-bbr-congestion-control-02.pdf https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-iccrg-b... I think there is also a recording of that session somewhere on youtube. Also, the complete paper can be downloaded for free at http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3022184 http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3022184