4 ms·
Fucking terrible that what they considered the number one item to mention on that page is how many patents they hold, rather than what the thing is, does, or is
by Kliment 9y ago
Fucking terrible that what they considered the number one item to mention on that page is how many patents they hold, rather than what the thing is, does, or is good for.
- desdiv 9y agoIt's a form of signaling[0]. In this case, it means: "Like you what you see here? Well unfortunately we can't sell it to you since we don't have the manufacturing capacity. So you'll have to license our IP so you can build it yourself." Case in point, Xerox licensed their IP and is already putting units in the field[1]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signalling_(economics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signalling_(economics) [1] http://www.packagingdigest.com/brand-protection/smart-label-with-memory-strengthens-pkg-authentication1606 http://www.packagingdigest.com/brand-protection/smart-label-...
- scientific_ass 9y agoSomeone once said "Patents have become a kind of currency now". It's sad to see that people are scaling innovation using only patents.
- em3rgent0rdr 9y ago50+ ways to ensure this won't be adopted universally until patents expire. 50+ ways to hold back innovation.
- bborud 9y agoTo be honest: they have been around for 20 years and haven't really done anything yet. I don't think they will. I think they want to sell their patents to a troll.