3 ms·

How much more targeted and useful are their suggestions compared to a rule-based tool like proselint[1]? [1] https://github.com/amperser/proselint https://gith

• astrodev 9y ago
  I can't make any general statements. I checked both tools against a document that was recently corrected by a human proofreader. Out of six errors found by the human, Grammarly identified three and proselint none. "only half of the mass if accounted for by the stars", misspelling "if" -> "is" "in the heath death scenario", misspelling "heath" -> "heat" "The quantity follows Gaussian distribution.", missing article