4 ms·
They threw together a bunch of contradicting studies, assigned weights without discussion of the assigning methods and parameters, then decided on an average an
by Mithaldu 9y ago
They threw together a bunch of contradicting studies, assigned weights without discussion of the assigning methods and parameters, then decided on an average and declared it a fact, instead of being honest and saying "we don't know either way". Based on this overall pattern i don't think i have much trust that their decision making process wasn't biased.
As for incomplete. I'm sorry, but there are no two ways about it. Incomplete means to be missing a part. It is. How important this is in the big picture is a different question.
- jquery 9y agoFor something that's so obviously damaging and mutilation and horrible and obscene, you'd think the science wouldn't at least be equivocating. The science should make you happy. You can still oppose circumcision, and you don't have to feel so much sympathy for circumcised people like me. Win/win.
- EGreg 9y agoWhich organization's decision making progress did you find unbiased, that you based your conclusions on?