4 ms·
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4479488/Saudi-king-orders-relaxation-male-guardianship.html#ixzz4gOp7T2qR http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-447948
by ankushnarula 9y ago
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4479488/Saudi-king-orders-relaxation-male-guardianship.html#ixzz4gOp7T2qR http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4479488/Saudi-king-o...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-male-guardianship-relax-women-work-study-gender-equality-a7721641.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-ar...
- unfunco 9y agoArticle similarities aside, those might be two of the worst websites to quote as sources, the Daily Mail is banned from being cited on Wikipedia as it's not a reputable source; and the Independent is no longer producing what many people would consider journalism.
- tutufan 9y agoThere's a lot of that going around these days...
- ankushnarula 9y agoThose two links came up when I typed my initial search to verify the original source. When I later changed my query to "saudi arabia male guardianship" I found the main stream of related articles on Google News: https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=d8vQiW5woz_iD_MaFaFAQMVeK6WbM&q=saudi+arabia+male+guardianship https://news.google.com/news/story?ncl=d8vQiW5woz_iD_MaFaFAQ... Note: I am not evaluating thousands of sourced references per day like Wikipedia - nor do I have a partisan political agenda. In this case, I evaluated the source content and it seemed fairly apolitical. Very likely, both of my linked sources used an AP or Reuters articles as their primary source.