3 ms·
I actually agree with this as a guideline, but not as a rule. Since it's listed as a guideline, I'm not complaining. I've (anecdotally) seen a number of cases
by eganist 10y ago
I actually agree with this as a guideline, but not as a rule. Since it's listed as a guideline, I'm not complaining.
I've (anecdotally) seen a number of cases where complaints have encouraged critical thinking on the part of voters as to whether a comment deserves a downvote or is being downvoted simply as a byproduct of groupthink. I know it's changed my mind on at least one occasion as it's gotten me to take into consideration that the person making the comment is surprised at the volume of downvotes, suggesting that the person writing the comment thought the comment would be less controversial, potentially warranting a deeper read.
I understand the desire to minimize complaints about downvotes, but like any good guideline, sometimes an alternative is more effective.
- sandworm101 10y agoIs a contrivercial comment meant to be downvoted? If controvercial comments are discouraged HN is just another echo chamber. I only downvote things that do not contribute. Something that is controvercial by definition contributes at least something. Talking about downvoted does at least expose some of the improper downvote storm. There is a population here that actively seeks to rescue comments that are downvoted simply for being unpopular. They should be allowed to express thier concerns somewhere.