3 ms·
(That might just be because people expect Youtube content to be free, though. It might be different if all the content is behind the subscription paywall from t
by stcredzero 10y ago
(That might just be because people expect Youtube content to be free, though. It might be different if all the content is behind the subscription paywall from the start.)
Either way, you'll lose Youtube's viral aspect, that comes down to millions of ten-year-olds with tons of time and no money spreading your content.
You can have advertiser-driven content for ten-year-olds and paywalled content for people who have money.
- derefr 10y ago...which is what Youtube Red is. But everyone starts by consuming the advertiser-driven content, and this content anchors them on what the platform "should" cost.
- stcredzero 10y ago...which is what Youtube Red is Not exactly. YouTube Red distributes funds in a manner similar to Spotify. But everyone starts by consuming the advertiser-driven content, and this content anchors them on what the platform "should" cost. How is it that growing up with a guardian doesn't "anchor" everyone on what everything "should" cost?
- fzzzy 10y agoYouTube Red does have Red-exclusive content, too.