4 ms·
Which is orthogonal to this discussion. Mainly because I don't believe Basic Income would gain any traction in the US. So we need to find other solutions.
by s73ver 9y ago
Which is orthogonal to this discussion. Mainly because I don't believe Basic Income would gain any traction in the US. So we need to find other solutions.
- mikepurvis 9y agoIt's a matter of correctly framing the discussion. Lots of basic income forms already exist in the US, including: - Pensions - Alaska Permanent Fund - Child tax credits - Stimulus cheques - Social Security - Welfare I just don't think it's a huge stretch to jump from these kinds of payments to an expectation that the government of a wealthy nation would supply all citizens with a stipend. Maybe the phrase "basic income" is too closely associated with socialism... in that case, call it an automation tax credit or something. Once people start receiving the cheques, they'll realize that it's a pretty good deal— kind of like the ACA.
- jganetsk 9y ago> I don't believe Basic Income would gain any traction in the US. The United States House of Representatives passed a Basic Income bill written by Richard Nixon in 1969. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vHYFzYvCak https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vHYFzYvCak
- s73ver 9y agoDo you think the same bill today would have anywhere near a chance of passing? I don't.