3 ms·
No, he's just saying they probably announced this at a point where their network is (presently) too weak to achieve what they want, so they may be shooting them
by shallot_router 9y ago
No, he's just saying they probably announced this at a point where their network is (presently) too weak to achieve what they want, so they may be shooting themselves in the foot a little bit.
They're still doing the right thing, no doubt.
- kyledrake 9y ago> their network is (presently) too weak to achieve what they want That's certainly a plausible hypothesis, but without evidence, definitions of words like "weak" and a proper wash through the scientific method, I'm not convinced we can make conclusions like that at this point in time.
- geofft 9y agoThat's not a conclusion, it's a claim by a human in a discussion. It is certainly not the case that you need a double-blind study before you can have any opinion on a subject (and, I'd argue, a complete misunderstanding of the scientific method). It's certainly a more defensible claim than the completely irrelevant ad hominem you made about Keybase being "docile in the face of evil". Why was the commenter's employer relevant to the discussion?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- inimino 9y agoYou not being convinced is no excuse for derailing the discussion. Behavior like this makes people think twice about even trying to engage with the crypto-loving, privacy conscious, free-speech market segment, because even trying to do anything in that direction is met with abuse.