3 ms·
Because no sane person wants to do the investment unless is provided material benefits. 2->3 provides no such material benefits, which is why they're being so a
by matt_wulfeck 9y ago
Because no sane person wants to do the investment unless is provided material benefits. 2->3 provides no such material benefits, which is why they're being so aggressive about EOL timetables.
- thehardsphere 9y ago1. 10 years is not aggressive for an EOL timetable. 2. What is the material benefit to rewriting the whole thing from scratch in any language, just to get around an EOL timetable?