4 ms·
I think that's only true if you're already familiar with Haskell-like languages. Elm-html is conceptually close to React/Redux so you basically have to learn it
by ng12 10y ago
I think that's only true if you're already familiar with Haskell-like languages. Elm-html is conceptually close to React/Redux so you basically have to learn it either way. Even knowing a few functional languages already it took a while for me achieve a basic level of competency with Elm. On the other hand someone who knows Java can pick up JS in an afternoon.
- Risord 10y agoI don't know. I felt sameway that elm was easier when I was learning Vue with all modern shiny stuff. I had done mostly C#/Java and some old school JS programming but none Haskell likes. It's hard to say which ones was easier since learning experiences were so different. Maybe learning took approximately same time but time was used with JS for googling and brute forcing things. On the other side Elm compiler just said "You probably did this common error ####. Try do ###" so learning was much more efficient since you know instantly what was wrong and why. I can certainly say that learning Elm was much more pleasant one for me.