4 ms·
It's a language with a long cultured tradition, that was formalized very early on. Of course that early formalization would have an impact, that's what you woul
by Florin_Andrei 9y ago
It's a language with a long cultured tradition, that was formalized very early on. Of course that early formalization would have an impact, that's what you would expect.
The many layers of meanings is again what you would expect to emerge after a long history of entangling various fields of knowledge, such as philosophy, history, theology, etc, in a dense web with language at its core seen as a primary tool of exploration in these fields (their metaphysics postulated that words have "power" in and of themselves, so language automatically acquired very high status).
Some of these developments are also seen in Europe historically, but not to the same extent. Probably because there was no single unifying language there to play that role (Latin did play that role, but too briefly, and there was no continuity on that level between the ancient Greek tradition and the latinizing Middle Ages - while the whole eastern half of that cultural ecosystem skewed towards a Slavic lingua franca, and even then mostly for religious purposes).
- freshhawk 9y agoThe ability to compose sentences with multiple correct and interrelated meanings made me want to learn it. That sounds fascinating and beautiful, the best possible language for poetry.
- ganfortran 9y agoBut computers hate ambiguity.
- Florin_Andrei 9y agoWhich is why the whole "computer language" meme is probably bullshit. It's definitely good for poetry, however.
- freshhawk 9y agoBut as I understand it the ambiguity is not in the grammar, but only related to the high prevalence of homonyms.