2 ms·
This was also my thought when I made the comment... I am sure that for certain use cases, there are more tailored solutions, but "SQL + keystore" seems like a
by sbarre 10y ago
This was also my thought when I made the comment...
I am sure that for certain use cases, there are more tailored solutions, but "SQL + keystore" seems like a fairly universal, affordable and versatile stack.
- user5994461 10y agoThey are different databases. Riak is a key value store, not unlike the core of redis. The SQL database is obviously relational. Ignoring the difference for a minute. If you can fit data in Redis, chances are that they can fit in riak and a RDBMS is not needed at all. Why Riak only then? It is one of the very few databases that can be clustered. It is sharded, multi-master, highly available, to talk in buzzwords. It is very reliable and very robust, you can add/remove nodes as you wish, replication is highly configurable, etc... Postgre/Mysql/MariaDB + Redis have no HA. They are both the disaster in disaster recovery.
- aries1980 10y agoIf you want SQL and proper master-master replication, check Couchbase.