3 ms·
Yes, I make the assertion that all people, including defenseless babies, should be free from harm. Now, the nick I leave as a compromise, b/c I do understand t
by bluejekyll 10y ago
Yes, I make the assertion that all people, including defenseless babies, should be free from harm.
Now, the nick I leave as a compromise, b/c I do understand that this is a fundamental requirement of the religion as it is followed. This allows for religious practice to be followed with out mutilating the child.
- pugio 10y agoA nick is harm. Either you compromise your morals or you don't. If you do make allowances for other concerns (ie. religious practice), then you're debating degree, not kind. Also, while a nick _may_ work for certain religions, it serves zero purpose for Judaic circumcision, and would actually be forbidden as unnecessary harm.