Your argument seems to me to be that a society should permit religious groups within it to live by the rules of their religious texts. You don't support the arg

Your argument seems to me to be that a society should permit religious groups within it to live by the rules of their religious texts. You don't support the argument with reasoning, however. As far as I can tell you're relying on some implicit notion that religious beliefs merit respect (in multiple facets) simply by virtue of their existence which is, at best, a controversial assertion. The question of whether Jewish men proceed to success after the alteration may indicate something about the severity of the alteration, but it certainly isn't a reason supporting routine circumcision. Your point regarding gender reassignment surgery is irrelevant and, as far as I can tell, a way to imply hypocrisy and substitute that as a counter argument for pro-abolotion positions.