> And yet, when you change the name of the company, the argument somehow doesn't apply. This is a ridiculous argument -- you're not "changing the name of the c

> And yet, when you change the name of the company, the argument somehow doesn't apply. This is a ridiculous argument -- you're not "changing the name of the company" you're changing the entire business that they're in. You're just arguing that Apples and Oranges are the same except they have different names. > I'd make the argument that Facebook has just a powerful monopoly on social networking as ISPs have on service. That might well be a problem, but that's a different problem involving different companies, different services, and different issues. Conflating them doesn't add anything to this discussion.