> And calling it mutilation implies those who have and want to have this engage in mutilation akin to FGM. It's irresponsible. It is akin to FGM when it's done

> And calling it mutilation implies those who have and want to have this engage in mutilation akin to FGM. It's irresponsible. It is akin to FGM when it's done nonconsensually (which it is, in the vast majority of cases for both sexes). Disclaimer: I understand that FGM is much more sexually debilitating and AFAIK never has a medical need behind it, but victims of circumcision are also being (usually needlessly) deprived of a functional part of their sexual organ.