> The order meant individuals were free to say, watch and make what they want online, without meddling or interference from Internet service providers. > Witho

> The order meant individuals were free to say, watch and make what they want online, without meddling or interference from Internet service providers. > Without net neutrality, big companies could censor your voice and make it harder to speak up online. Hmm, was it ever prohibited for e.g. some Twitter user to write your ISP an angry letter calling you a Nazi, so they shut your internet off to avoid the headache? I've only heard about "net neutrality" in the context of bandwidth pricing. It's very different if companies are legally required to sell you internet(except maybe short of an actual crime).