3 ms·
This post explores the phenomenon of URL shorteners, discusses the potential impact of the recent announcement by Twitter (a favorite site of mine) to rewrite a
by swombat 16y ago
This post explores the phenomenon of URL shorteners, discusses the potential impact of the recent announcement by Twitter (a favorite site of mine) to rewrite all links shared through the service, and makes a few specific recommendations on how to improve on these implementations.
What a god-awful way to start a post. Nothing of interest to hook the mind.
What is a URL shortener?
You've all seen short URLs before — the links to tinyurl.com, bit.ly, wp.me, etc., recently popularized as a workaround to fit more content into smaller spaces, most notably within Twitter's 140 character limits. URL shorteners work by taking any arbitrary URL (which can contain hundreds of characters or more) and creating a new URL, typically only a handful of characters plus the short domain name, and returning a 301 or a 302 HTTP response code that redirects the browser from the short URL to the original.
More factual pointlessness. There is nothing whatsoever that is interesting in that second paragraph.
scrolls down
3.5 thousand words written in that style? No thanks.
Writing is designed to be read by people. If you have a point, present it digestibly or keep it to yourself.
- tkahn6 16y agoI actually enjoyed this writing style and I'm glad he shared his thoughts - I found what he had to say interesting. I think I enjoyed it for the very reason you didn't.
- olefoo 16y agoI guess I'm too used to the more bureaucratic forms of literature, I barely noticed his literary style. But the substance of his post, beneath the tedium, is worth paying attention to. If twitter follows through with their plan to require client applications to report back whenever someone clicks on a link passed through twitter; I would find it to be a less compelling platform.
- ComputerGuru 16y agoI think you've been spoiled by twitter-stlye "articles." 140 characters, bluntly to the point, with no appreciation for the arts.
- swombat 16y agoNo. I've been spoiled by articles that justify their existence in the first few lines, instead of requiring the reader to make a leap of faith and trust the author with half an hour of their precious time. Actually, I haven't been spoiled, they're still fairly rare.