I wouldn't, myself, characterize your original comment in this thread as "discuss[ing]" sex differences, but rather as asserting them. That's not to say they d

I wouldn't, myself, characterize your original comment in this thread as "discuss[ing]" sex differences, but rather as asserting them. That's not to say they don't exist — they most certainly do, though perhaps not necessarily in the forms so many like to think. But your comment reads to me as, "See! There it is again!" which smells like nothing so much as confirmation bias.