3 ms·
> I see no other reason why they should have 300X the employees. Well, that's a little unfair. When you measure from 1, virtually any number will look like an
by dpark 10y ago
> I see no other reason why they should have 300X the employees.
Well, that's a little unfair. When you measure from 1, virtually any number will look like an absurd multiple. Calling it 300x makes it sound ridiculous but for a company with $80MM in revenue, 300 employees doesn't seem to be unreasonable.
- lr4444lr 10y agoFair enough on the relative change, but what new core ongoing function does Wikipedia have since 2005 to merit the raw numbers?
- dpark 10y agoNo idea. I'm just commenting on the way the data is presented. 300 doesn't seem absurd to me. How many they actually need, though, I don't know.