4 ms·
I'm not afraid of a theoretical article, but this is, even for me, very dry. While it sounds interesting, I'm not sure what universe even means in this context.
by kutkloon7 9y ago
I'm not afraid of a theoretical article, but this is, even for me, very dry. While it sounds interesting, I'm not sure what universe even means in this context...
- mafribe 9y agoUniverse means: model of set theory. Goedel's incompleteness theorems guarantee the existence of non-standard models of set theory (and Peano arithmetic). Hamkins cleverly uses non-standard models to construct a single program that can (simplifying a bit) exhibit arbitrary behaviour, depending in which universe (= model of set theory) you interpret it.
- mrout 9y agoI'm not sure there's much point just repeating the article in the comments.
- mrout 9y agoThis is just maths, there's nothing dry about it compared to any other article about maths.
- ultrafilter 9y agoIn the real world, Hamkins' program would search forever, never outputting anything. In the context of a "nonstandard" version of the line of natural numbers, "finite" no longer means what you think it means. In this context, Hamkin's program does output something after a "finite" number of steps, and Hamkins can make the program output whatever he wants by changing the meaning of "finite" instead of changing the program.