That makes sense. I think you jumped to quickly to interpreting the original comment as an intent to influence the standard. I read it as just "here is a though

That makes sense. I think you jumped to quickly to interpreting the original comment as an intent to influence the standard. I read it as just "here is a thought that might be useful/relevant to the people who are making the thing so that they can use it as they see fit when making the standard". No big deal either way!