I found the article was far longer than it needed to be and took a long time to explain what actually was going on, and seemed to take a circuitous route to its

I found the article was far longer than it needed to be and took a long time to explain what actually was going on, and seemed to take a circuitous route to its conclusion. Saying that thought I did find it very interesting, and worrying. What can people do about it really though? I mean, I think people vote with conviction for whatever they vote for - and no one likes to be told they've been conned, or made a fool of.