sorry, but i think he's totally correct and it's a good faith comparison. they're both speakers that have been subject to offended parties try to shut down thei

sorry, but i think he's totally correct and it's a good faith comparison. they're both speakers that have been subject to offended parties try to shut down their speeches. there's no reason besides base tribalism to think one is appropriate to shut down and the other isn't. the principle of free speech is why we should allow both to speak publicly, as well as any detractors who wish to protest.