4 ms·
I'm not sure what you're implying when you say it's "interesting". If you have a problem with the equation of anti-Tibet political intervention by China and an
by erikpukinskis 10y ago
I'm not sure what you're implying when you say it's "interesting".
If you have a problem with the equation of anti-Tibet political intervention by China and anti-Palestine intervention by Israel then state your case.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> If you have a problem with the equation of anti-Tibet political intervention by China and anti-Palestine intervention by Israel then state your case. As much as Israel has colonized parts of Palestine by way of settlements, its nothing like the Chinese annexation and colonization of Tibet.
- rubatuga 10y agoPerfect, let's downplay Israel by shitting on China! In reality, both of these are clear examples of how the victor gets to write the history books. By getting rid of the conversations, this is unequivocally censorship.
- echaozh 10y agoWhat about the white annexation and colonization of America?
- erikpukinskis 10y agoEqually bullshit. I can admit Israel is better than colonial America. Kind of a low bar though. I don't think I'd have a problem with people advocating for settlements if they acknowledged they were colonizing native people in order to eradicate their culture. At least be honest about it. People act like Israel is some sort of liberal state.
- int_19h 10y agoThat distinction largely irrelevant in the context of how either is trying to interfere with freedom of speech on the campuses of American universities. And the comparison is pretty obvious, because I can't think of any other countries that are doing something similar, at least on a noticeable scale (i.e. actually getting results they want).