2 ms·
I think adblockers will lead to something worse: extremely in-depth data harvesting. When publishers can no longer make money on ads, they will turn to companie
by soared 10y ago
I think adblockers will lead to something worse: extremely in-depth data harvesting. When publishers can no longer make money on ads, they will turn to companies offering them similar amounts of income ($1 per 1000 pageviews) for just placing a tracking pixel on the page. The pixel will just track absurd amounts of data, enough to justify the cost.
My example is Ibotta [1]. You can your entire shopping receipt and they give you cash back for buying certain products. While these 'coupons' prompt you to buy a product, Ibotta's real profit comes from data harvesting. They create a profile that knows where you shop, what you buy, how often, how much you spend, where you live, etc. etc. This data can be sold to companies like P+G for marketing intelligence ('Who is actually buying our products, for how much, how often? etc')
[1] https://ibotta.com/ https://ibotta.com/
- throwaway2048 10y agoad-blockers can block tracking pixels just as easily. If they want to move it server side, well the same could be done with ads too, the problem is that website owners can then manipulate and defraud extremely easily.
- soared 10y agoAds can't be moved served nearly as easily as a single tracking pixel. Fraud on server side code is a good point, but that seems like a technical hurdle that could be solved.