Bad article. >The clumsy wings of males could be rationalized as a handicap that provides information about the birds’ condition or genetic quality. Also know

Bad article. >The clumsy wings of males could be rationalized as a handicap that provides information about the birds’ condition or genetic quality. Also known as an honest indicator of fitness. >But the observation that female club-wings have also probably made themselves less capable fliers can only be described as decadent — Why the "probably" there? Previously the author mentioned that the bones where hollow in the females, unlike the males. Maybe they can fly just fine! >sexual selection leading to a decline in the capacity for survival. Yeah but, the fact that they exist, shows that they have survived.