4 ms·
How about one that goes tweet by lying tweet? One that was literally on the first page of Google. You can't have exerted yourself too hard. https://www.amalan
by abritinthebay 10y ago
How about one that goes tweet by lying tweet? One that was literally on the first page of Google.
You can't have exerted yourself too hard.
https://www.amalanetwork.com/latest/2016/07/23/shills-and-scandals-the-misleading-dncleaks-tweet-by-tweet https://www.amalanetwork.com/latest/2016/07/23/shills-and-sc...
Again - they repeatedly mislead. They did it again with the CIA dump.
Due to their repeated misleading, obviously slanted, presentation of their dumps, and obvious mishandling of them (like putting 1000s of innocent civilians at risk) Wikileaks has zero credibility.
- who-benefits 10y agoDue to your apparent need to discredit any unpleasant truth about your team, you don't have any credibility either. Next time link a source with a better exclamation-point/sentence-without-logical-fallacy ratio. I feel stupider having read that tripe
- abritinthebay 10y agoAhh ad hominem on both me and the source! Impressive. Thanks for conceding you have nothing.
- Natsu 10y agoThat seems to disagree with certain conclusions reached by Wikileaks after reading various emails. It does not appear to substantiate any claims that actual documents were faked. The Wikileaks tweets all appear to link to their sources, allowing for this kind of lengthy disagreement with those simplified conclusions.