> Exert yourself. I have, and I can't find a single instance where Wikileaks presented edited versions of the emails and made claims about them such that the c

> Exert yourself. I have, and I can't find a single instance where Wikileaks presented edited versions of the emails and made claims about them such that the contents of the email revealed the edited version to be inaccurate and/or lies. You stated there are plenty of examples. I'm just asking for one. If there are plenty, it should not be difficult to find one, but like I said in my original comment, everyone makes these statements about Wikileaks but no-one provides actual hard examples of it. As a counter example, in my post I claimed that many people said emails in Wikileaks were falsified, but later evidence showed this was not the case. It's trivial to find an example of this, such as Donna Brazile stating that the emails showing she provided CNN townhall interview questions to Clinton in advance were doctored [0], but DKIM verification later showed the emails were authentic [1], and Brazile later admitted she did actually leak the questions [2]. That was easy enough to find in Google without any exertion. So where are the examples of Wikileaks lying and/or misleading people about the contents of specific emails? I'm just asking for one example. 0: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/megyn-kelly-donna-brazile-wikileaks-230064 http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/megyn-kelly-donna-braz... 1: http://blog.erratasec.com/2016/10/yes-we-can-validate-wikileaks-emails.html http://blog.erratasec.com/2016/10/yes-we-can-validate-wikile... 2: http://www.salon.com/2017/03/20/finally-donna-brazile-apologizes-for-passing-debate-questions-during-clinton-sanders-primary-battles/ http://www.salon.com/2017/03/20/finally-donna-brazile-apolog...