3 ms·
I searched GCC Bugzilla and found one result[0] for GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW. [0] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13823 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
by tjalfi 9y ago
I searched GCC Bugzilla and found one result[0] for GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW.
[0] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13823 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13823
Edited to add the following text.
There is one result[1] for GLIBCXX_FORCE_NEW.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65018 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65018
- marvy 9y agoI think these days it goes by GLIBCXX_FORCE_NEW
- hcs 9y agoDefault bugzilla search doesn't include resolved, verified, and closed bugs. That said, I only found one slightly relevant, which was resolved invalid, saying the env var should be used: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10183 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10183 And that's just due to not freeing the pools, not whatever is the complex problem here.