3 ms·
There seems to be a complaint about unisex bathrooms, and people who support and push for the "Contributor Convent", which I hadn't heard of before. Reviewing
by dsp1234 9y ago
There seems to be a complaint about unisex bathrooms, and people who support and push for the "Contributor Convent", which I hadn't heard of before.
Reviewing it[0], I'm having a hard time figuring out what the complaint is. I wholly concede that my lack of understanding may be related to my own biases.
But recently there was a conversation that mentioned the ACM code of conduct[1], and how software engineers should be more aware of the effects of their code, and to act ethically.
Can someone speak to the differences between the two, and why one would be looked down on, but the other would be something to strive for?
[0] - http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/ http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/
[1] - http://www.acm.org/about/se-code http://www.acm.org/about/se-code
- DanBC 9y agoA tiny criticism of the Covenant > for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. They've made up their own list, and come up with something a bit odd. There's some overlap (body size is covered by personal appearance) and some gaps (no mention of neuro diversity, which would seem to be important for that audience).