3 ms·
It's a shame you're getting downvoted, I thought your comment was quite insightful, if a little pessimistic. There has certainly been lots of doom and gloom in
by switchbak 9y ago
It's a shame you're getting downvoted, I thought your comment was quite insightful, if a little pessimistic.
There has certainly been lots of doom and gloom in the past, with some (not all) of it quite justified - look how close we came to nuclear annihilation multiple times during the cold war. It was only cool headed individuals that kept all of humanity from a tragic end. Those fears were well justified, and we're getting to a similar situation right now, so close that William J. Perry thinks we're at the highest likelihood of nuclear war since the Cuban missile crisis.
Those war-based risks are of a very different (political) nature however, one that doesn't persist after the war pressures subside. With climate change, we're in a much different situation, and one that I'm actually not sure we're up to solving. If we look at progress so far, I don't think it looks good.
It's a shame it's being converted into a political and tribal game. We're talking about the survival of an advanced species here (hell, it might be the only one). There is literally nothing more important than that.
- averagewall 9y ago> the survival of an advanced species here No we're not. That's not the risk of global warming. Such false extremist ideas are part of the tribalism you mention and make it worse.
- vanjoe 9y ago> kept all of humanity from a tragic end Humanity would have survived, lots of people would Die, but not everyone