3 ms·

Arbitration Showdown Looms Between Congress, Supreme Court

2 points by grellas 16y ago

JonPerz 16y ago
Perz Vs. Mossy Toyota Superior Court of California - County of San Diego: Case Number: 37-2007-00066485-CU-BC-CTL Previously rear ended and submerged non disclosed flood car bound by arbitration lasting into 4th year. Arbitrators: #1 Refused to hear the case. #2 Dismissed for Bias. #3 Record of 40-0 against consumers, Superior Court says that's cool and A-OK, refuses opinion and compel. (June 2010) See the video and leave your comments: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sCUmXfy03c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sCUmXfy03c Read the story: http://www.mossyscrewedme.com http://www.mossyscrewedme.com Join The Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=405196671351 http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=405196671351 Please spread this story...Support the Arbitration Fairness Act HR:1020 and the need for a fair playing field between consumers and big business. "Those who demands, requires and appoints the arbitrator most likely gets repeat business"...Sound fair? ---------------------------------------------------------- Mossy Toyota sold me a previously rear ended and submerged flood car and refused to take it back. Demanded mandatory binding arbitration and has strung this out now into the 4th year. Mossy had three options if they really cared about customer satisfaction: 1) Fix the vibration as promised (it would have never been discovered that it was a flood car and previously rear ended). 2) Exchange the vehicle for another at no added cost. 3) Refund the purchase as requested (without laughing in my face). Mossy chose none of these instead ignoring the situation and refusing to do anything about it, hiding behind a clause. After an auto investigator determined the car was once submerged and previously in a rear end collision I sought legal representation. After Mossy Toyota was shared this discovery they still refused to do anything about it demanding arbitration.... Sticking it to the consumer hiding behind an arbitration clause that they most likely knew would get away with. The Auto Industry should not be exempt from the Financial reform bill and the Arbitration Fairness Act HR:1020 should be passed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Regardless of my outcome, I wish my personal story can bring change to laws that protect consumers from predatory business practices. Please share!
awongh 16y ago
what's unconscionability?

2 points by grellas 16y ago

Perz Vs. Mossy Toyota Superior Court of California - County of San Diego: Case Number: 37-2007-00066485-CU-BC-CTL Previously rear ended and submerged non disclosed flood car bound by arbitration lasting into 4th year. Arbitrators: #1 Refused to hear the case. #2 Dismissed for Bias. #3 Record of 40-0 against consumers, Superior Court says that's cool and A-OK, refuses opinion and compel. (June 2010) See the video and leave your comments: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sCUmXfy03c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sCUmXfy03c Read the story: http://www.mossyscrewedme.com http://www.mossyscrewedme.com Join The Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=405196671351 http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=405196671351 Please spread this story...Support the Arbitration Fairness Act HR:1020 and the need for a fair playing field between consumers and big business. "Those who demands, requires and appoints the arbitrator most likely gets repeat business"...Sound fair? ---------------------------------------------------------- Mossy Toyota sold me a previously rear ended and submerged flood car and refused to take it back. Demanded mandatory binding arbitration and has strung this out now into the 4th year. Mossy had three options if they really cared about customer satisfaction: 1) Fix the vibration as promised (it would have never been discovered that it was a flood car and previously rear ended). 2) Exchange the vehicle for another at no added cost. 3) Refund the purchase as requested (without laughing in my face). Mossy chose none of these instead ignoring the situation and refusing to do anything about it, hiding behind a clause. After an auto investigator determined the car was once submerged and previously in a rear end collision I sought legal representation. After Mossy Toyota was shared this discovery they still refused to do anything about it demanding arbitration.... Sticking it to the consumer hiding behind an arbitration clause that they most likely knew would get away with. The Auto Industry should not be exempt from the Financial reform bill and the Arbitration Fairness Act HR:1020 should be passed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Regardless of my outcome, I wish my personal story can bring change to laws that protect consumers from predatory business practices. Please share!

awongh 16y ago

what's unconscionability?