3 ms·
According to GoDaddy, AWS and Rackspace, it is not. Not for non-DMCA complaints, anyway. Side note: I wrote this.
by schwanksta 9y ago
According to GoDaddy, AWS and Rackspace, it is not. Not for non-DMCA complaints, anyway.
Side note: I wrote this.
- ryanlol 9y agoWhy are you cherry-picking the most expensive enterprise hosting companies in the industry? Those are hardly representative of the rest.
- schwanksta 9y agoWhat? AWS and GoDaddy are not terribly expensive. GoDaddy is incredibly common. I don't know about Rackspace. Together they make up a large chunk of the Internet as we know it.
- ryanlol 9y agoAWS and Rackspace are terribly expensive, GoDaddy is huge in the domain space but not particularly big in hosting, besides shared-. Why not look at the likes of OVH, Hetzner, Voxility, Colocrossing and so on. Or maybe try Level3, their business may be a bit different but they're HUGE and certainly forward abuse reports.
- untog 9y agoI'm no expert, but a quick Google leads me to http://www.webqom.com/blog/2016_web_hosting_market_share_trends.html http://www.webqom.com/blog/2016_web_hosting_market_share_tre..., which states that GoDaddy is the most popular hosting provider out there.
- ryanlol 9y agoYes, Godaddy sells lots of shared hosting at insane margins. These insane margins help pay for a big abuse department. Most dedicated hosting providers don't have as big margins because they can't stuff 1000+ customers on one server. Most dedicated hosting providers don't have very big abuse departments, or any abuse department at all.
- detaro 9y agoWhat does price have to do with not stripping contact information from a report?
- ryanlol 9y agoIt's got everything to do with having a bunch of humans handling your abuse reports. It's also one of the reasons why IP reputation is so important to these hosts.