"That's required for transparency" Other companies handle abuse reports just fine without ever having to give away the identity of the whistle blower. > This

"That's required for transparency" Other companies handle abuse reports just fine without ever having to give away the identity of the whistle blower. > This kind of thinking A public website is not a private workload. You are comparing apples and oranges. And in any case, Amazon prohibits offensive content in their acceptable use policy. https://aws.amazon.com/aup/ https://aws.amazon.com/aup/. If someone reported you for unacceptable use, count on Amazon invading your "privacy".