4 ms·
First I pissed off on Elm, and have been observed many the leader's reasons behind things people do not like. However, it is hard to make arguments against reas
by Existenceblinks 9y ago
First I pissed off on Elm, and have been observed many the leader's reasons behind things people do not like. However, it is hard to make arguments against reasons from his point of view (e.g. https://github.com/elm-lang/projects/blob/master/roadmap.md https://github.com/elm-lang/projects/blob/master/roadmap.md)
Now, it really makes sense to me that he made it hard on JS interop and discourage js-wrapped packages. We should move forward, even WebAssembly team, as I imply, want to ditch javascript completely (But people don't want to say it out for unhealthy discussion) Here is a talk about what/why/some how/ on WebAssembly https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH9NYzH3-74 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH9NYzH3-74
We don't need "component" things in Elm, though if you mean "module", I'm sorry. I really don't understand why people still build things on top javascript that is fundamentally and practically wrong (No need to elaborate _this_!)