Those are trivial concerns. Any law/rule/entitlement that we've ever created is based on context, historical interpretations, and relies on various human factor

Those are trivial concerns. Any law/rule/entitlement that we've ever created is based on context, historical interpretations, and relies on various human factors. Coming up with questions doesn't poke holes in the concept at all. >exactly how much healthcare access is a right. Its not that hard to make a distinction between cancer and catching a cold. Pretty much all laws take into account intent, credibility, reasonable justification and other vague ill-defined criteria. >what if the required resources are not available in the same amount any more? Based on available funds, the codified law would be either stricter or looser on the qualifying criteria. >Are people's rights now violated, Yes, they would be. >and if so, by whom? You should be able to sue the party given the task of dispensing healthcare and make your argument.