4 ms·
It's not broken; to be fair, I would definitely call keepassxc better/more up-to-date but it hasn't been as battle-tested as keepassx (even though it's the same
by scrollaway 10y ago
It's not broken; to be fair, I would definitely call keepassxc better/more up-to-date but it hasn't been as battle-tested as keepassx (even though it's the same codebase).
They're both just as appropriate to use, which is why I recommend keepassx. I do use keepassxc myself however.