4 ms·

>KeepassX hasn't been updated in a while. Is it broken somehow?

• lucideer 9y ago
  "broken" is highly subjective, but here's a list of the issues that originally motivated the fork: https://github.com/keepassx/keepassx/pulls https://github.com/keepassx/keepassx/pulls Discussion for context: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/43 https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/43
• scrollaway 9y ago
  It's not broken; to be fair, I would definitely call keepassxc better/more up-to-date but it hasn't been as battle-tested as keepassx (even though it's the same codebase). They're both just as appropriate to use, which is why I recommend keepassx. I do use keepassxc myself however.