16 ms·

Read the article. Visited link to Wikipedia article? Daymit, how you can SURVIVE on 35K a year in USA??? Maybe somewhere in Mississippi, but not in North USA. S

by ilkhd2 16y ago

Read the article. Visited link to Wikipedia article? Daymit, how you can SURVIVE on 35K a year in USA??? Maybe somewhere in Mississippi, but not in North USA. Still, you'll have to eat random crap from 7-11 and macdonalds...

thecombjelly 16y ago
I and many of my friends survive on less than 10K in the USA. Even Derek Sivers (from Mixergy interview) claims to live on 20K or less.
- pyre 16y ago
  And that is able to cover: shelter, food, health care, transportation, electricity, internet? I'd really be interested in seeing a break-down of costs and how that is possible. [Note: I realize that electricity and Internet are not necessary to survive, but the person claiming to survive on $20K/year obviously has both.] [Aside: I hope that the answer doesn't come down to something stupid like, "I invested $1-million in making my house/property as self-sufficient as possible." That kinda excludes a good portion of the population from trying.]
  - nostrademons 16y ago
    A couple friends of mine have done it - they're both physics grad students in Boston. I don't know the full breakdown of their finances (nor would I share it on the Internet if I did), but I know rent and transportation and can fill in the rest from my experience: Person 1: Rent = $600/month (1 roommate in a small condo on a bus line) Transportation = $0 (walks to work/store/bank) Health care = ~$0 (grad school presumably covers it, modulo co-pays) Food = ~$200/month (guessing at this, lives on lots of rice & beans) Electricity = ~$50/month (also guessing) Internet = $0 (uses it from work if necessary) Total = $850/month = $10k/year Person 2: Rent = $400/month (basement apartment with 3 roommates) Transportation = ~$130/month (T-pass, off Green Line) Food = ~$200/month (guessing) Health care = ~$0 (presuming he's under the university policy) Electricity = ~$50/month (guessing, may be less with 3 roommates) Internet = ~$10/month (you could split $40 cable or FIOS among 4 roommates) Total = $790/month = about $9500/year. It's amazing how many necessities really aren't if you're willing to compromise on things like appearances, location, status, etc. Even in Silicon Valley, you can get rents of $600/month if you're willing to share a place in Sunnyvale or one of the poorer sections of Mountain View, and you can get really cheap food if you're willing to eat various rice/beans/pasta dishes. And many people seem to forget that they have two legs and can walk places: I'm in sprawled-out Silicon Valley, not densely-packed Boston, and yet I walk to the bank/library/supermarket and bike to work.
    - ilkhd2 16y ago
      Ok, but they have free healthcare (at least 400$/month worth), live in miserable living conditions (3 roommates in a basement), and have 0 savings. And, apparently they walk naked. Do not forget to add taxes. And waterbill. And trashbill. And phonebill. My observations are in total correspondence with Daniel Kanemann's research: For good life in USA you need $60K/year - more will not make you happier, less will make you unhappy.
      - nostrademons 16y ago
        3 roommates in a basement is only miserable living conditions when compared to the McMansions that people are moving into now. My dad grew up in a 3rd world country. His family would be considered upper-class within their city, and yet they had 10 children crammed into a couple rooms, geckos in their living spaces, and mosquito nets to keep away the malaria. And they got bombed out of their home by the Americans, and had to move up into the mountains, shit in the river, and use stones to wipe their ass. I included waterbill and trashbill in my utilities estimates; I was basing it off what I paid for utilities when I lived with roommates in California. Person 1, at least, didn't have a landline - he used his cell (still on his parents plan) or IM from work. Person 1 also did not have zero savings: he managed to save up $20K over 2 years. Remember, a typical grad student salary is about $20k/year, and he was living off $10K/year. People who make $10-20k/year don't pay much in taxes. Many don't pay anything. That's reverse-income-tax land. You have a point with clothes, but over the short term, it can be ignored. I'm still wearing some of my clothes from high school, 10 years later. And you certainly have a point about health care, which is the elephant in the room, though that will hopefully get better as Obama's plan phases in. I suspect that Daniel Kanemann's research could be rephrased as "For a good life, you have to be making more than average." It's not coincidence that $60K/year is just slightly more than median household income in the U.S. I suspect that if he were to run the same experiment in Vanuatu - supposedly the happiest place on earth - he'd find that you need roughly $5K/year for the good life. That's just slightly over their per-capita GDP.
        ojbyrne 16y ago
        People who make 10-20k a year still pay FICA. I did some rough calculations and someone making $400 a week in California will pay 20% in federal and state taxes, medicare and social security.
  - steveklabnik 16y ago
    Here's a rough look at my finances. I currently take home $2k a month, and live in the city of Pittsburgh, for reference. I live in one of the nicer neighborhoods in the city, though I managed to find a pretty cheap place. Rent: $325/mo ($950 split three ways) Student loan bills: $500/month Fios/gas/electric: $70/mo, (again, $210 split three ways.) Food: I eat out a fair bit, so probably like $500/mo, on average? I could cut down on this a lot if I tried. Transportation: I bike everywhere. Spent $600 three years ago. Phone: $60/month, Nexus One on T-Mobile with unlimited data/text, small amount of minutes that I never use. I don't currently have health care. That puts me at roughly $1450 of spending. I'm sure I'm forgetting something minor. But for just expenses, that'd end up being $17,400 / year.
teaspoon 16y ago
Jason Rohrer is an American programmer whose family has annual expenses of less than $15k: http://hcsoftware.sourceforge.net/jason-rohrer/supportMyWork.php http://hcsoftware.sourceforge.net/jason-rohrer/supportMyWork... From the sound of it, they're not living on Big Macs. But they do live an unconventional lifestyle and have made material sacrifices to minimize their consumption.
- ilkhd2 16y ago
  I think, his parenting rights has to be taken back. He buys toys for kids used - which is very unhealthy. And he will not be able to buy cutting edge or very good stuff this way. No new books kids - Nope! Dad knows better. No new dress - nope! Dad has THE idea! In case of emergency he will not be able to pay for care for kids, unless he depend on government provided healthcare (do not get me wrong, I am "socialist" myself and I am pro-government-run-care), which unreliable, and does not cover many things. My opinion - yes you have to try to live cheap life, but not by buying used stuff - somebody else, with not really cheap life bought it first, but buying inexpensive stuff and using as long as possible, till it falls apart.
  - BrandonM 16y ago
    Is this comment serious, or were you just trying to figure out a good way to get downvotes?
    - ilkhd2 16y ago
      Absolutely serious.
ebiester 16y ago
There's a difference between survival and a middle class lifestyle. For those of us who have lived poor at some point, it's a point of privilege to have all of these luxuries. Even so, if you look at the lifestyle of a single person on 35k a year, it's vastly superior to that of someone in the 1980s in many aspects, with health care and real estate as major exceptions.
- ilkhd2 16y ago
  hmm..Not sure. 35K in 1980 were a lot bigger money :). Superior by the way because of globalization - which created better (?) material supply, but made jobs in USA horrible trash.
blehn 16y ago
Really, it's not that hard. Conservative estimates: Wages: 35k Taxes: 10.5k Rent: 1000/mo = 12k Utilities: 200/mo = 2.4k Transportation (car): 200/mo+200/mo = 4.8k Food: 400/mo = 4.8k Total: 34.5k Get a roommate, use public transportation, get rid of TV, make your own meals, and you could probably put 5-8k in the bank each year. Even if you're living in NYC, it should be pretty easy to "survive" on 35k a year.
- BrandonM 16y ago
  For me (the differences) -- Rent [1]: 300/mo = 3.6k Transportation [2]: 100/mo = 1.2k Food [3]: 250/mo = 3k Total: 20.7k Obviously that leaves a lot of things out, but that is what the other $14K+ is for. If you can't live on 35K, I'm guessing it's because you're either carrying too much debt, or you've convinced yourself you need to spend $X/mo on a car/living in <expensive city>/whatever when you really don't. [1] Right now I actually am renting an entire house with one roommate and we each pay $125/mo, but we are renting from a friend. Before I moved here, I paid about $240 a month. I could easily find a place under $300/mo here in Columbus, OH. [2] I don't have a car right now; instead I use public transportation or ride with my roommate or other friends. Even giving my friends gas money and renting a car once a month or so would only come to 1-1.5K per year. [3] I could easily get by on about $125/mo for groceries. Doubling that allows me to go out a couple times a week as well.
HeyLaughingBoy 16y ago
People do it all the time. I had a friend who never made more than $20k her whole life and yet was able to own her own house (a tiny cottage here in the Minneapolis metro area), have a running car (bought used and maintained properly) and eat well (cooked her own meals, rarely ate out). I haven't talked to her in about 7 years, but as far as I know, she's doing fine. I lived alone with no roommates in Fairfield County, CT (a pretty expensive area) for more than 5 years while making less than $30k and was perfectly happy. It just requires managing your finances well.
steveklabnik 16y ago
I've never made close to 35K. I've been self-sufficient for the last 4 years or so, and I was living on roughly $17k for most of that, and I'm living comfortably on $24k right now. I mean, Pittsburgh is a cheap city, but still, I live in the city. If I lived in the 'burbs I could do it for less. Well, maybe not, needing a car would probably make up the savings in other expenses.

by ilkhd2 16y ago

thecombjelly 16y ago

I and many of my friends survive on less than 10K in the USA. Even Derek Sivers (from Mixergy interview) claims to live on 20K or less.

pyre 16y ago
And that is able to cover: shelter, food, health care, transportation, electricity, internet? I'd really be interested in seeing a break-down of costs and how that is possible. [Note: I realize that electricity and Internet are not necessary to survive, but the person claiming to survive on $20K/year obviously has both.] [Aside: I hope that the answer doesn't come down to something stupid like, "I invested $1-million in making my house/property as self-sufficient as possible." That kinda excludes a good portion of the population from trying.]
- nostrademons 16y ago
  A couple friends of mine have done it - they're both physics grad students in Boston. I don't know the full breakdown of their finances (nor would I share it on the Internet if I did), but I know rent and transportation and can fill in the rest from my experience: Person 1: Rent = $600/month (1 roommate in a small condo on a bus line) Transportation = $0 (walks to work/store/bank) Health care = ~$0 (grad school presumably covers it, modulo co-pays) Food = ~$200/month (guessing at this, lives on lots of rice & beans) Electricity = ~$50/month (also guessing) Internet = $0 (uses it from work if necessary) Total = $850/month = $10k/year Person 2: Rent = $400/month (basement apartment with 3 roommates) Transportation = ~$130/month (T-pass, off Green Line) Food = ~$200/month (guessing) Health care = ~$0 (presuming he's under the university policy) Electricity = ~$50/month (guessing, may be less with 3 roommates) Internet = ~$10/month (you could split $40 cable or FIOS among 4 roommates) Total = $790/month = about $9500/year. It's amazing how many necessities really aren't if you're willing to compromise on things like appearances, location, status, etc. Even in Silicon Valley, you can get rents of $600/month if you're willing to share a place in Sunnyvale or one of the poorer sections of Mountain View, and you can get really cheap food if you're willing to eat various rice/beans/pasta dishes. And many people seem to forget that they have two legs and can walk places: I'm in sprawled-out Silicon Valley, not densely-packed Boston, and yet I walk to the bank/library/supermarket and bike to work.
  - ilkhd2 16y ago
    Ok, but they have free healthcare (at least 400$/month worth), live in miserable living conditions (3 roommates in a basement), and have 0 savings. And, apparently they walk naked. Do not forget to add taxes. And waterbill. And trashbill. And phonebill. My observations are in total correspondence with Daniel Kanemann's research: For good life in USA you need $60K/year - more will not make you happier, less will make you unhappy.
    - nostrademons 16y ago
      3 roommates in a basement is only miserable living conditions when compared to the McMansions that people are moving into now. My dad grew up in a 3rd world country. His family would be considered upper-class within their city, and yet they had 10 children crammed into a couple rooms, geckos in their living spaces, and mosquito nets to keep away the malaria. And they got bombed out of their home by the Americans, and had to move up into the mountains, shit in the river, and use stones to wipe their ass. I included waterbill and trashbill in my utilities estimates; I was basing it off what I paid for utilities when I lived with roommates in California. Person 1, at least, didn't have a landline - he used his cell (still on his parents plan) or IM from work. Person 1 also did not have zero savings: he managed to save up $20K over 2 years. Remember, a typical grad student salary is about $20k/year, and he was living off $10K/year. People who make $10-20k/year don't pay much in taxes. Many don't pay anything. That's reverse-income-tax land. You have a point with clothes, but over the short term, it can be ignored. I'm still wearing some of my clothes from high school, 10 years later. And you certainly have a point about health care, which is the elephant in the room, though that will hopefully get better as Obama's plan phases in. I suspect that Daniel Kanemann's research could be rephrased as "For a good life, you have to be making more than average." It's not coincidence that $60K/year is just slightly more than median household income in the U.S. I suspect that if he were to run the same experiment in Vanuatu - supposedly the happiest place on earth - he'd find that you need roughly $5K/year for the good life. That's just slightly over their per-capita GDP.
      - ojbyrne 16y ago
        People who make 10-20k a year still pay FICA. I did some rough calculations and someone making $400 a week in California will pay 20% in federal and state taxes, medicare and social security.
- steveklabnik 16y ago
  Here's a rough look at my finances. I currently take home $2k a month, and live in the city of Pittsburgh, for reference. I live in one of the nicer neighborhoods in the city, though I managed to find a pretty cheap place. Rent: $325/mo ($950 split three ways) Student loan bills: $500/month Fios/gas/electric: $70/mo, (again, $210 split three ways.) Food: I eat out a fair bit, so probably like $500/mo, on average? I could cut down on this a lot if I tried. Transportation: I bike everywhere. Spent $600 three years ago. Phone: $60/month, Nexus One on T-Mobile with unlimited data/text, small amount of minutes that I never use. I don't currently have health care. That puts me at roughly $1450 of spending. I'm sure I'm forgetting something minor. But for just expenses, that'd end up being $17,400 / year.

teaspoon 16y ago

Jason Rohrer is an American programmer whose family has annual expenses of less than $15k: http://hcsoftware.sourceforge.net/jason-rohrer/supportMyWork.php http://hcsoftware.sourceforge.net/jason-rohrer/supportMyWork... From the sound of it, they're not living on Big Macs. But they do live an unconventional lifestyle and have made material sacrifices to minimize their consumption.

ilkhd2 16y ago
I think, his parenting rights has to be taken back. He buys toys for kids used - which is very unhealthy. And he will not be able to buy cutting edge or very good stuff this way. No new books kids - Nope! Dad knows better. No new dress - nope! Dad has THE idea! In case of emergency he will not be able to pay for care for kids, unless he depend on government provided healthcare (do not get me wrong, I am "socialist" myself and I am pro-government-run-care), which unreliable, and does not cover many things. My opinion - yes you have to try to live cheap life, but not by buying used stuff - somebody else, with not really cheap life bought it first, but buying inexpensive stuff and using as long as possible, till it falls apart.
- BrandonM 16y ago
  Is this comment serious, or were you just trying to figure out a good way to get downvotes?
  - ilkhd2 16y ago
    Absolutely serious.

ebiester 16y ago

There's a difference between survival and a middle class lifestyle. For those of us who have lived poor at some point, it's a point of privilege to have all of these luxuries. Even so, if you look at the lifestyle of a single person on 35k a year, it's vastly superior to that of someone in the 1980s in many aspects, with health care and real estate as major exceptions.

ilkhd2 16y ago
hmm..Not sure. 35K in 1980 were a lot bigger money :). Superior by the way because of globalization - which created better (?) material supply, but made jobs in USA horrible trash.

blehn 16y ago

Really, it's not that hard. Conservative estimates: Wages: 35k Taxes: 10.5k Rent: 1000/mo = 12k Utilities: 200/mo = 2.4k Transportation (car): 200/mo+200/mo = 4.8k Food: 400/mo = 4.8k Total: 34.5k Get a roommate, use public transportation, get rid of TV, make your own meals, and you could probably put 5-8k in the bank each year. Even if you're living in NYC, it should be pretty easy to "survive" on 35k a year.

BrandonM 16y ago
For me (the differences) -- Rent [1]: 300/mo = 3.6k Transportation [2]: 100/mo = 1.2k Food [3]: 250/mo = 3k Total: 20.7k Obviously that leaves a lot of things out, but that is what the other $14K+ is for. If you can't live on 35K, I'm guessing it's because you're either carrying too much debt, or you've convinced yourself you need to spend $X/mo on a car/living in <expensive city>/whatever when you really don't. [1] Right now I actually am renting an entire house with one roommate and we each pay $125/mo, but we are renting from a friend. Before I moved here, I paid about $240 a month. I could easily find a place under $300/mo here in Columbus, OH. [2] I don't have a car right now; instead I use public transportation or ride with my roommate or other friends. Even giving my friends gas money and renting a car once a month or so would only come to 1-1.5K per year. [3] I could easily get by on about $125/mo for groceries. Doubling that allows me to go out a couple times a week as well.

HeyLaughingBoy 16y ago

People do it all the time. I had a friend who never made more than $20k her whole life and yet was able to own her own house (a tiny cottage here in the Minneapolis metro area), have a running car (bought used and maintained properly) and eat well (cooked her own meals, rarely ate out). I haven't talked to her in about 7 years, but as far as I know, she's doing fine. I lived alone with no roommates in Fairfield County, CT (a pretty expensive area) for more than 5 years while making less than $30k and was perfectly happy. It just requires managing your finances well.

steveklabnik 16y ago

I've never made close to 35K. I've been self-sufficient for the last 4 years or so, and I was living on roughly $17k for most of that, and I'm living comfortably on $24k right now. I mean, Pittsburgh is a cheap city, but still, I live in the city. If I lived in the 'burbs I could do it for less. Well, maybe not, needing a car would probably make up the savings in other expenses.