3 ms·
Except that researchers also haven't seen the information converging to a single point, which should be obvious if it's happening. I agree that the computing i
by SomeStupidPoint 9y ago
Except that researchers also haven't seen the information converging to a single point, which should be obvious if it's happening.
I agree that the computing is done with moving charges and chemical propagation (at substantially below the speed of light), but that doesn't account for how the information gets integrated in to a single signal for experience. But we also see that kind of structure in, eg, the proposal to build a TQC, where you build a computation in to non-local structures built out of entangled particles by moving around charges at substantially lower than the speed of light.
If it's not being amalgamated in to a point object (which doesn't seem to be the case -- there's no 'you' point in the brain), then it must be being amalgamated to a non-local object.