> Now imagine a thousand years from now, new phenomena or understandings will generate concepts that can model free will that is both non-random and non-determi

> Now imagine a thousand years from now, new phenomena or understandings will generate concepts that can model free will that is both non-random and non-deterministic. This abstractly makes sense, but I think the free will supporters still have the burden of proof of, right now, explaining at least at a very high level what free will would be if not random/deterministic. Otherwise we must lend credibility to all kinds of crazy theories.