> How would you feel if Common Lisps suddenly started sporting infix operator notation? You mean like this? (I linked it the other day.) https://github.com/ri

> How would you feel if Common Lisps suddenly started sporting infix operator notation? You mean like this? (I linked it the other day.) https://github.com/rigetticomputing/cmu-infix https://github.com/rigetticomputing/cmu-infix But one might argue that the prefix notation + macros being able to support such a library is just further testament to their use as default...