4 ms·
One counter argument is that you're still building on the same foundation. Likewise C++ isn't going to be as concise as Haskell ever. So the paper still hold
by digitalzombie 9y ago
One counter argument is that you're still building on the same foundation.
Likewise C++ isn't going to be as concise as Haskell ever.
So the paper still hold some truth if not mostly valid.
- cies 9y agoThe conclusion mentioned some interesting truisms about prototyping, team-size-induced-complexity and "long bugs" vs "short bugs". Good stuff. If the PDF was not a collection of images of the text, i'd have copy-pasted that bit here. :)