> I'm not talking past anyone -- I'm just choosing to ignore the silly aspersions to my intelligence. There haven't been any "silly aspersions" to your intelli

> I'm not talking past anyone -- I'm just choosing to ignore the silly aspersions to my intelligence. There haven't been any "silly aspersions" to your intelligence. You just didn't exhibit a sufficient knowledge of the problem to dismiss the article like you did. Computer science is a large field, and it doesn't say anything at all about your intelligence if you're unaware of one particular implementation of one particular type of software by one particular author. You're the one who's cast this whole conversation into a competition, not me. > It's possible to make an argument without calling the other guy stupid. Exactly, which is why I responded like I did, and gave you an opportunity to explain whether I misunderstood you. You, on the other hand, responded with sarcasm and rhetoric, and clarified nothing.