3 ms·
I'm with you on not getting a 'smart' TV, but this comment reeks of elitism: "Better still is to forego on television altogether but if you insist on having can
by chadgeidel 9y ago
I'm with you on not getting a 'smart' TV, but this comment reeks of elitism: "Better still is to forego on television altogether but if you insist on having canned 'entertainment' (panem et circensis) beamed into your domicile"
What if I want to play games, watch movies, or just sit down and otherwise enjoy myself? Is everything that comes on a screen an unnecessary diversion or is it just a screen of a certain size?
- hammock 9y agoYour games and movies can be ultrasound beacons too..a board game cannot.
- Yetanfou 9y agoIn what way is it 'elitist' to dislike the pablum ditched out by television channels? Strange, the way things go. It used to be that those who did not have a television set were seen as backwards but now it seems to be the opposite. I never liked television programming, not as a child, not as an adult. There is nothing elitist about it, I just like doing things myself. BTW, the mere fact that you're replying to a message I submitted to this forum should tell you it I do not consider everything that comes on a screen an unnecessary diversion, given the fact that the probability of me using a screen to read and enter text here is rather high. Television is quite well-defined as being a medium designed for mostly passive consumption of entertainment and information. It is the combination of hardware and a whole industry to provide programming to animate those screens. It is the latter, the industry and its products, which I dislike. The hardware can be quite useful.